Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(s3stream): wait for the background executor to close when shutting down the S3 storage #876

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

ShadowySpirits
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…ng down the S3 storage

Signed-off-by: SSpirits <admin@lv5.moe>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7efe717) 54.99% compared to head (a288c8e) 54.97%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #876      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     54.99%   54.97%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity     1246     1243       -3     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8535     8535              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
- Hits           4694     4692       -2     
  Misses         3426     3426              
- Partials        415      417       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 54.58% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Proxy 37.18% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
RocketMQ Store 73.57% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

…ng down the S3 storage

Signed-off-by: SSpirits <admin@lv5.moe>
@ShadowySpirits ShadowySpirits merged commit 74c6698 into main Jan 4, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@ShadowySpirits ShadowySpirits deleted the s3_storage_shutdown branch January 4, 2024 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants